The Mael Review

The Mael Review

The Mael Dossier

Tal Alexander Was Convicted on Count 2. His Lawyer Says He Wasn't There.

Defense Attorney Deanna Paul Denies the Allegation Outright as Evidence Gaps Come Into Sharper Focus

Daniel Mael's avatar
Daniel Mael
Mar 11, 2026
∙ Paid

Yesterday, I wrote about my genuine confusion about how the jury convicted Tal Alexander on Count 2 of sex trafficking, given the numerous inconsistencies in the evidence presented at trial. In seeking to square the verdict with the record, I reached out to Tal Alexander’s lawyer, Deanna Paul, for comment. Her response was unequivocal:

“Tal Alexander was never with Ms. Acree in the Hamptons in 2011.”

This categorical denial from the defense, coupled with the evidentiary issues previously examined, deepens the mystery of a conviction that appears to defy the standard of reasonable doubt.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to The Mael Review to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2026 Daniel Mael · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture