7 Comments
User's avatar
Leigh Halprin's avatar

Actually, it tells me more about Marc Kasowitz. I, too, am a lawyer who is an ardent Zionist and there is no way that I would ever, ever, ever act for anyone who vomited the obscene rhetoric that Owen does. My dislike for her and the fact that she has made the worst accusations against Jews, of which I am one, would put me in a position of a conflict of interest and call into question my ability to deliver the best defence. The “everyone is entitled to representation” argument doesn’t fly. There are lots of clients and cases lawyers refuse. There are lots of lawyers who would be delighted to act for her. IF, his agenda in acting is to expose her hypocrisy, that would be unethical. IF his agenda is to prove that Jews have the integrity to rise above these slurs and do the right thing, that is also unethical. It’s hard to believe that he really believes in the merits of her case and that he is the best person to represent her. Frankly, I am nonplussed.

Moderation's avatar

Agree, it says much more about the motivation and values of the attorney than it does about her.

Kip 🇺🇸🇮🇱🟦's avatar

Candace Owens is a glorified ape.

Debkin's avatar

Even Archie bunker would say that’s ok

webcraft's avatar

Subject: Evidence of Actual Malice Regarding Candace Owens and the Brigitte Macron Conspiracy Theory

https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMw_4c205e8d-be77-4ab1-a527-bb9efea29e21

Afi Koman's avatar

Candace says Jews control the world. So it is totally logical for her to seek a world controller to win her case.